Salasya Slams DCI Over Excessive Force in His Arrest

Mumias East Member of Parliament Peter Salasya was released on bail Monday following his arrest on Friday in connection with alleged hate speech violations. 

The arrest, which involved a dramatic interception on the Isiolo-Nanyuki Highway, has stirred controversy regarding law enforcement tactics and due process.

Salasya was apprehended on May 16 after individuals identified as Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) officers reportedly intercepted his convoy. The MP claims shots were fired at his vehicle, and his security detail was disarmed during the incident. 

Salasya, who was returning from political engagements in Meru and Isiolo, was taken into custody after initially evading capture by fleeing into nearby bushes. The charges against Salasya stem from allegations of hate speech, formally presented during his arraignment at the Milimani Magistrate’s Court. The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) confirmed that Salasya faces charges under the National Cohesion and Integration Commission Act. 

Salasya has denied these accusations, asserting they are based on misinformation disseminated by fraudulent social media accounts impersonating him. Principal Magistrate Paul Mutai granted Salasya a surety bond of Ksh500,000 or a cash bail alternative of Ksh200,000. Court proceedings experienced a brief delay due to inconsistencies in the charge sheet, necessitating a courtroom transfer. Despite these procedural issues, Salasya secured his release later that day.

Following his release, Salasya addressed the press, criticising the manner of his arrest, which he likened to the treatment of high-profile criminals. He has questioned the appropriateness of the law enforcement methods used, particularly given his position as an elected official with state-provided security. Salasya emphasises the potential dangers of such forceful interventions.

Salasya’s arrest raises concerns about adherence to the rule of law and due process in Kenya. 

While the government has intensified efforts to combat inflammatory political rhetoric, questions persist regarding the proportionality of enforcement measures. Supporters view the arrest as an attempt to silence dissent, while critics argue that the MP must be held accountable for his statements.