Please Forgive Me, My Boss: Gachagua Publicly Apologises to Ruto

Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has publicly appealed for forgiveness amid an intense impeachment crisis.

During a church service in Karen, Nairobi, on Sunday, October 6, Gachagua addressed President William Ruto and the Kenyan people, expressing remorse and seeking reconciliation. This emotional plea comes as Gachagua faces mounting pressure and calls for his removal from office. In his address, Gachagua emphasizes his commitment to public service and desire to continue serving the nation without controversy. He directs his appeal to President Ruto and his wife, Dorcas Rigathi, acknowledging her efforts in programs aimed at empowering young men.

The backdrop to Gachagua's plea is a surge in public discontent, manifested through recent participatory forums where citizens voiced their grievances. These sessions, integral to parliamentary procedures, have seen a growing number of Kenyans express dissatisfaction with Gachagua's performance, citing concerns ranging from corruption allegations to perceived inefficiencies in government programs. In response, Gachagua has addressed the nation, asking for forgiveness for any actions or statements that may have been found unacceptable.

Despite his conciliatory tone, Gachagua appears resolute in his intention to mount a vigorous defence against the impending impeachment motion in Parliament. With significant support for his removal among MPs, the DP faces a formidable challenge. Gachagua has publicly dismissed the reasons behind the impeachment as "fabricated lies," alleging that they are intended to tarnish his and his family's reputation. His declaration of readiness to fight back suggests a determination to confront what he perceives as politically motivated attacks rather than genuine governance concerns.

The political climate surrounding Gachagua has been further complicated by several legal cases reportedly filed against him and his allies in various courts. Political analysts view this situation as a critical test for the administration, particularly in how it manages dissent both within its ranks and among the public.