Uhuru Park
- Add new comment
- 223 views
A contentious debate has emerged in Nairobi following Governor Johnson Sakaja's approval to lease resting areas at Uhuru and Central Parks, a decision made during a Cabinet meeting on December 3, 2024.
This initiative aims to generate revenue and foster Private-Public Partnerships (PPPs) but has faced staunch opposition from local leaders who fear it may lead to the privatization of public spaces. The plan is designed to align with legal, environmental, and urban development objectives. Proponents assert that leasing these areas could improve facilities and enhance visitor experiences, stimulate economic growth through job creation, and ensure environmental sustainability while preserving public access.
However, the proposal has drawn criticism from various county leaders. Nairobi County Assembly Deputy Minority Leader Waithera Chege, Embakasi Central MP Benjamin Gathiru, and Dandora 1 MCA Allan Gathuku have all expressed strong objections. They argue that, as the rightful owners of these facilities, the public should play a crucial role in the decision-making process. Chege emphasizes the importance of obtaining County Assembly approval, stating that decisions impacting public spaces must adhere to established protocols.
Gathiru raises concerns regarding potential financial burdens on Nairobi residents, particularly families who utilize these parks regularly. He accuses the governor of failing to engage other leaders in consultation and warns that the initiative could prioritize financial gain over public welfare. Similarly, Gathuku highlights that many park visitors are unemployed or in need of low-cost recreational options.
He contends that the introduction of entry fees would be inequitable for city residents and urges the governor to reconsider the leasing plan. The parks, which were significantly renovated by the Kenya Defence Forces in 2022, are currently free and accessible to the public. While the proposed leasing initiative seeks to transform Nairobi’s green spaces into vibrant urban assets, it has ignited a debate about the balance between economic development and public access.
The new corruption is termed ppp. Who elects these dimwits