Why Documentation Matters in Matrimonial Property Cases

Kenyan courts are increasingly navigating the fraught landscape of matrimonial property disputes, with a pronounced emphasis on tangible evidence to substantiate claims of ownership.

Recent judgments from the Kitale High Court and the Supreme Court of Kenya emphasise that while contributions to a marriage can take myriad forms, documented proof remains the cornerstone for equitable asset division upon dissolution. These rulings signal a tightening of judicial scrutiny in these cases, compelling divorcing parties to provide concrete evidence of their financial and non-financial inputs into the marital estate.

At the heart of this judicial trend lies the Matrimonial Property Act, a legislative framework designed to recognise the diverse contributions made by spouses during their marriage. However, the application of this act is anything but straightforward, as highlighted by the Kitale High Court case involving IC and SS.

While IC asserted that she had bankrolled the purchase of a 10-acre farm, the absence of her name on the sale agreement and the lack of supporting receipts proved fatal to her claim for an equal share. Despite recognising her contributions to the family, the court found that the lack of documentary evidence was too big a gap to overlook.

Although the court did recognise that IC's non-monetary contributions to the family were enough to warrant a 50 percent share of the farm. The Supreme Court's handling of the case between JOO and MBO further illuminates the complexities involved. This case transcended multiple levels of the Kenyan legal system, grappling with the retrospective application of the Matrimonial Property Act and the contentious issue of equal division of assets.

While the Supreme Court ultimately rejected the notion of an automatic 50:50 split upon divorce, it affirmed the Court of Appeal's decision to award MBO half of the matrimonial home and rental income. The decision rested on the meticulous documentation of MBO’s financial contributions, including loans she secured to finance the construction of rental units.

Legal experts suggest that the emphasis on evidence reflects a broader move towards greater accountability and transparency in matrimonial property disputes. While the Matrimonial Property Act seeks to acknowledge the multifaceted contributions of spouses, courts are wary of opening the door to unsubstantiated claims that could undermine the sanctity of property rights.