US Documents Dismiss Railas 2007 Stolen Election Claim

US Documents Dismiss Railas 2007 Stolen Election Claim

Declassified US documents on Kenya could spark debate on the controversial 2007 general election that plunged the country into post-poll violence.

A document by former US ambassador to Kenya Michael Ranneberger is among 7,000 others released by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The report, titled Did Kibaki Really Steal The Election?, challenges an assertion by Raila Odinga that he lost the election in an intricate rigging scheme.

Raila claimed the scheme involved Electoral Commission of Kenya officials and PNU operatives at grassroots levels.

“This flies in the face of the position adopted by the ODM and others as mantra: That the election was brazenly stolen by Mwai) Kibakis ECK insiders at the last moment and that Raila should have won by a wide margin," the report says.

"It also contradicts any perception or conviction within the Kibaki camp that the latter clearly won the race. The fact of the matter is, as ECK Chairman Kivuitu said publicly on January 1, I do not know if Kibaki won the election."

The report states that an audit of the voting material could not provide a clearer indicator of who won the presidential race, despite ECKs announcement that Kibaki did.

“What the analysis does tell us is that it’s not at all clear who actually would have won the presidency had the election been truly transparent, free, and fair,” said Ranneberger.

The six-page document also details monitor groups concerns over the level of poll tallying irregularities that made it difficult to determine an outright winner.

“Despite praise from all quarters that election day voting was generally free and fair, in fact there is strong circumstantial evidence indicating that more traditional forms of cheating, such as ballot stuffing at polling stations and/or constituency-level tallying centers, probably played an important role in determining the final results of the 2007 presidential election,” Ranneberger said.

He added that evidence collected by observers showed massive electoral malpractice from both ODM and PNU

This development is a stark contrast to an endorsement of the Kibaki victory by the Obama administration, which later called for a review of the process to prevent violence.

Rannebergers report ends with a recommendation for electoral body reforms to prevent a repeat of the 2007-2008 chaos that claimed 1,500 lives and displaced 600,000.

“After what happened during this election, Kenya’s electoral institutions cannot credibly conduct free, fair, and transparent election until fundamental reform has been carried out,” he said.

- The Star

Comments

Mwakilishi     Mon, 11/23/2009 @ 12:16am

This sycophants should also tell us why bush stole elections against Algore.They should stop meddling na siasa za Africans n concentrate
Building their collapsing USA

Mwakilishi     Mon, 11/23/2009 @ 12:16am

@Mkenya Halisi, sober and in-the-know Kikuyus will tell you as you're reading this comment that: RAILA'S Presidency was stolen in 2007. They knew it but Kibaki's GREED was NOT going to let the Stolen Presidency go. And you can take to the bank what I just

Mwakilishi     Mon, 11/23/2009 @ 12:16am

Finally peace of mind for former prime minister who believes that only Westerners can solve his problems and that of Kenya. Be it be elections, investigations,Trials na kadhalika.
Poa Mzee poa umepata dose yako.

Mwakilishi     Mon, 11/23/2009 @ 12:16am

I know many will not agree with my position on this but I still maintain that, for once, Raila Amolo Odinga actually won these elections. This is the only time he came really close to getting inside City Hall but then he didn't. Unfortunately, this was his last opportunity to lead Kenya and I think it would be a great idea for him to strategize on exiting the Kenyan political scene in grace for he shall never become president.

Mwakilishi     Mon, 11/23/2009 @ 12:16am

@MLACHAKE and others who believe or state that Raila won need to read the Kleiggler commission report. You will the understand what transpired, it stated that both parties cheated on the ballots that it was practically impossible to tell who would have won. So if that election was about stealing and cheating, then the thief who steals the most was the winner of the excercise. Those who were close to the happenings sday that cheating started in ODM stronghols and when the PNU side got wind of the cheating going on on the ODM side, they put theirs on in a frenzy. I believe the report thorough and truthful. My take is if you want to claim a win then don't get involved in cheating. You have seen the trend in ODM party elections so these are clearly people who believe in stealing to secure a win.

Mwakilishi     Mon, 11/23/2009 @ 12:16am

What is factual about the 2007 election is that the results were highly doctored by both PNU and ODM. After that fact, the narrative depends on who is talking. Never again should political party agents (including returning officers) be in charge of running elections. And if ODM's proposals for electoral commissioners to be appointed by parties based on their numerical strength in the national assembly are implemented, that is what will happen again!

Mwakilishi     Mon, 11/23/2009 @ 12:16am

Each time a leader gets in a governing position fraudulently, the masses are the losers. The unknown factor here is that, willing never know if either of them would have won on their own merits since they all cheated. Even if RAO did not win the presidency, he still won a pretty plummy position.
I also hope that we were not waiting for the West to validate,or reject who the winner was.Mwananchi should be able to do that on their own.
Finally, what good is that report to Mwananchi at this time?

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
2 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.