MPs Criticise Raila Odinga Over Alleged Interference in NG-CDF Debate

A schism has emerged within Kenya's political landscape as lawmakers from the Western region have vocally criticized Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) leader Raila Odinga over his perceived interference with ongoing efforts to constitutionally secure the National Government-Constituency Development Fund (NG-CDF). 

The MPs, representing constituencies in Western Kenya, argue that the fund is vital for grassroots development and are pushing for its protection through constitutional amendments. NG-CDF has been a subject of legal and political debate following a Supreme Court ruling that deemed its current structure unconstitutional due to violations of the separation of powers doctrine.

During a public engagement forum held on Wednesday, several Western Kenyan MPs voiced their concerns directly to Odinga, urging him to withdraw from the NG-CDF debate. Matungu MP Peter Oscar Nabulindo emphasized the respect he and his colleagues hold for Odinga but insisted that his involvement is unnecessary and potentially detrimental.

“Mr. Raila, you are above these matters. We respect you as a prominent leader, but please get out of this NG-CDF case,” Nabulindo stated. 

He also cautioned Odinga against aligning himself with governors or senators, asserting that MPs are the most direct representatives of the people. Mumias East MP Peter Salasya echoed Nabulindo's sentiments, warning Odinga against interfering in NG-CDF matters. Salasya asserted that Parliament would proceed with its plans to enshrine the NG-CDF in the Constitution, regardless of Odinga’s position, claiming widespread public support for the fund.

“We are going to show Raila that he is an ordinary citizen with one vote,” Salasya declared. “The majority have spoken; CDF is here to stay.”

Sirisia MP John Waluke issued a stern warning, stating that MPs would not allow the fund's removal. "We will not allow CDF to be removed, and if Raila wants his respect, Raila Odinga, whom we respect so much, let him not touch CDF. If he wants disrespect, we will serve him,” Waluke declared.

Khwisero MP Christopher Aseka highlighted the fund's significance, arguing that it has achieved more in terms of development than devolved funds managed by governors. "Anyone thinking they can do away with CDF is daydreaming; many people have benefited from these funds, especially the needy. The education sector and other areas have been greatly improved through NG-CDF," said Aseka.

The controversy over the NG-CDF stems from a Supreme Court ruling that the fund's existing structure violates the principle of separation of powers. The court argued that the fund, as it is currently administered, grants lawmakers undue control over executive functions. In response, MPs are spearheading constitutional amendments to safeguard the NG-CDF’s future, citing its critical role in supporting education, infrastructure, and security, particularly in rural constituencies. The legislative effort is centered on the Constitution of Kenya (Amendment) Bill (National Assembly Bills No. 4 of 2025), which seeks to entrench three funds in the Constitution:

• The National Government Constituencies Fund (NG-CF): To ensure the provision of exclusive national government functions at the constituency level.

• The National Government Affirmative Action Fund (NGAAF): To support marginalized groups.

• The Senate Oversight Fund (SOF): To enhance senators’ ability to oversee governors effectively.

Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse raised questions about Odinga’s alleged double standard, asking why he now opposes the NG-CDF despite having previously supported its constitutional anchoring. During the public participation forum in Makindu township, attendees overwhelmingly supported the constitutional entrenchment of the NG-CDF, citing its long-term developmental benefits. Participants emphasized the fund's unique contributions to community development.

“For the past 21 years, we have seen communities benefit from this fund. What we can celebrate as two successes in our country are NG-CDF and devolution. After elections, we have seen leaders—regardless of political affiliation—retreat to their backyards and drive development without escalation of wars due to pressure from limited resources,” said elder Mzee Noah Abubakar.

Stella Kisele, 65, emphasized the distinct roles of NG-CDF compared to devolved funds managed by counties. “NG-CDF deals with primary and secondary schools, security, and climate change issues. Some of these responsibilities don’t fall under governors' mandates. Counties should effectively utilize the funds they receive because we have seen governors mismanage public resources,” said Kisele.

Mutuse further cautioned that failure to secure NG-CDF and the other two funds constitutionally would set a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing future leaders to weaponize financial allocations against opposition strongholds.

The National Government-Constituency Development Fund (NG-CDF) was established in 2003 with the aim of allocating resources directly to constituencies for local development projects. The fund is intended to supplement national government initiatives and empower local communities by providing them with control over development priorities. The NG-CDF has been credited with facilitating numerous projects in education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other areas. 

Supporters argue that it has been particularly effective in addressing the needs of marginalized communities and promoting equitable development across the country. However, the fund has also faced criticism and controversy over the years. Concerns have been raised about transparency, accountability, and the potential for misuse of funds. Critics argue that the NG-CDF can be politicized and that it may not always be used in the most efficient or effective manner.

The Supreme Court's ruling that the fund's current structure violates the separation of powers doctrine has added another layer of complexity to the debate. The ruling has prompted lawmakers to seek constitutional amendments to protect the fund while addressing the court's concerns.