Latest
Trump Administration's Green Card Freeze Raises Concerns in Bay Area Tech CommunityAliko Dangote Acquires Significant Stake in Kenya Pipeline CompanyHow Kenyan Entrepreneur Wakenya Clewis Turned Her Tattoos into a Business in the USWhy You Are Not Allowed to Smile in Passport and ID PhotosKenyan Teachers Could Find New Jobs as Bahamas Explores RecruitmentUS Journalist Margot Kiser Sues Kenya Over Deportation and Immigration BanTrendingHow Kenyan Nurses in the US Are Going from CNA to RN to BSN to NP: Complete Career PathwayTrendingU.S. Citizens Wrongfully Detained by ICE Could Get $500,000 Under New BillTrendingUSCIS Ends 540-Day Automatic EAD Extension, Impacting ImmigrantsTrendingKenyan-Born Biotech Executive Enoch Kariuki Appointed to EpiCRISPR Board of DirectorsTrendingTwo Years in Seattle and My Cousin Who Grew Up in Matungulu, Machakos Already Talks Like a CNN AnchorTrendingHow Far Does $100K Go in America's Top Cities for Kenyan Immigrants?
AdvertisementTop banner · 970×90 / 728×90
Kenya

CS Mutua Accused of Favouring Ukambani in Overseas Job Placements

CS Mutua Accused of Favouring Ukambani in Overseas Job Placements

Kenya's Labour Cabinet Secretary Alfred Mutua faces mounting pressure amid allegations of regional favouritism in the country's overseas labour recruitment programme. 

Legislators have summoned Mutua to appear before Parliament to address a perceived imbalance in job placements, with accusations that a disproportionate number of opportunities are being directed to three counties in the Lower Eastern region. Data presented to the National Assembly Committee on Diaspora Affairs and Migrant Workers reveals a stark disparity in placement statistics. Between 20 and 27 November 2024, Machakos, Makueni, and Kitui counties account for a significant portion of successful placements. 

Machakos registered 1,260 applicants and secured 752 placements. Kitui records 901 job seekers placed out of 921 registered, while Makueni registers 506 and achieves 410 placements. The concentration of recruitment agencies in these counties has amplified concerns regarding regional bias. Committee Chairperson Lydia Haika voices serious concerns about the seeming imbalance, warning that the current recruitment model lacks national equity. 

AdvertisementIn-article ad

"Mobilising an entire county to compete for barely 10 slots while another region absorbs hundreds undermines trust in public institutions," she said, emphasising the need for greater accountability and transparency.

Other members of parliament echo these sentiments, framing the issue as symptomatic of systemic inequity in distributing state-facilitated opportunities. Ruweida Obo, Member of Parliament for Lamu East, challenged the ethics of the recruitment process, asserting that it is "untenable" for only six counties to benefit meaningfully from a national initiative, particularly when the most advantaged counties are from the Cabinet Secretary's region. 

Mombasa MP Zamzam Mohammed reinforces this concern, lamenting the monopolisation not only of labour export schemes but also of diplomatic appointments. She said that "This recruitment is not a village affair. All Kenyans should feel equally represented."

The National Employment Authority (NEA), tasked with overseeing overseas job facilitation, seeks to distance itself from the controversy. NEA Director General Edith Okoki maintains that the agency's role is limited to verifying agency credentials and registering job seekers. She clarifies that responsibility for actual placements and agency engagement rests solely with the Ministry of Labour. 

"Our mandate is limited. The selection criteria is beyond our jurisdiction," Okoki explained to the committee.

Despite these claims, NEA's data is central to the ongoing dispute, painting a picture of recruitment geography that seemingly sidesteps national diversity. While Murang'a, Nyandarua, and Baringo are also featured, they register significantly lower placements, insufficient to dispel concerns of bias. The Committee has now summoned Cabinet Secretary Mutua to provide a detailed explanation of the framework used, including the rationale for agency distribution and the apparent exclusion of most counties.

Comments

Comments are reviewed before they appear. Please keep it respectful.

No comments yet — be the first.

AdvertisementMore stories (Google matched content)

More from Kenya