Why Court Lifted Orders Blocking Kindiki's Swearing-In

Why Court Lifted Orders Blocking Kindiki's Swearing-In

The High Court of Kenya has definitively resolved the legal impediments surrounding Kithure Kindiki's ascension to the role of Deputy President.

A three-judge bench, presided over by Justice Eric Ogola and including Justices Anthony Mrima and Fredah Mugambi, has lifted previous conservatory orders that had prevented Kindiki's formal swearing-in. The judicial panel emphasizes the constitutional imperative of maintaining administrative continuity, with Justice Anthony Mrima articulating that the legal framework does not contemplate an extended vacancy in such a critical governmental position.

"The applications for conservatory orders are hereby disallowed. The conservatory orders on October 18, 2024, in Kerugoya High Court are hereby discharged and set aside," Justice Eric Ogolla pronounced.

The legal proceedings originated from a case filed by David Munyi Mathenge and Peter Gichobi Kamotho, who sought to prevent Kindiki's nomination after the National Assembly approved his appointment. This occurred in the immediate aftermath of the Senate's vote to impeach the previous Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. Former Attorney General Githu Muigai represented the National Assembly, arguing that the conservatory orders had been rendered moot by subsequent developments. Initially, High Courts in Nairobi and Kerugoya had issued orders preventing Kindiki's appointment, but the recent ruling comprehensively discharged these restrictions.

Kindiki, who has been serving as Interior Cabinet Secretary, was nominated by President William Ruto to replace Gachagua. The latter's impeachment followed allegations of constitutional violations and inciting ethnic tensions, accusations which Gachagua has consistently denounced as politically motivated. The judicial resolution has generated diverse political reactions. Kindiki's supporters have expressed enthusiasm about his potential leadership, while Gachagua's allies have signaled their intention to pursue further legal challenges, including a potential appeal to the Supreme Court.

Comments

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
1 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.