- Add new comment
- 784 views
A Nairobi court has extended orders blocking the transfer of a Sh1.5 billion property which Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua is claiming to be the owner.
On Monday, Environment and Lands Court judge Oguttu Mboya extended the orders to October 13th when the application before him will be heard.
Through his attorney Philip Nyachoti, Gachagua claims former Director of Physical Planning John Michael Ohas has tampered with records at the lands office in an attempt to rob him of the prime property located in Nairobi.
The lawyer told the court that the property is charged to Equity Bank as collateral for various financial facilities granted to Gachagua at Sh200 million.
The deputy president claims he has always been the legal and registered owner of the parcel of land and that he holds a title in respect of the same which was issued on June 18th, 2012.
He alleges that the respondents have illegally and fraudulently obtained a second title on the property while the plaintiff's title is still in existence and have deliberately tampered with the records at the Lands Registry in respect of the suit property such that any official search on the suit property currently indicates Ohas and his company Columbus Two Thousand Ltd are the registered owners of the property on the exclusion of the applicant.
Gachagua wants the court to order that the title deed in possession of the two defendants was obtained fraudulently, irregularly and illegally, hence invalid, null and void.
He is seeking orders to have the Lands Registrar rectify the register in the lands office to cancel all unlawful entries on behalf of the first and second defendants and indicate the plaintiff as the lawful owner.
Comments
GachaRuto are Corrupt Birds of a Feather flocking Together to Screw KENYA. They ain't Up to Anything good for KENYAns.
Riggy G your first public announcement after sown in as the VP you stated the coffers have 93 million until the current Finance CS proves you wrong in the public and termed it a mere delusional assumptions. That really portraits your character as been a master in chess which is true in your losing 200M which had no proof of its sources. Thus will be the same for this property case. Now in a diff case you're trying to play a game between the Chicken and egg which came out first.
That's why most people gave up voting simply because our leaders are pathetic thieves