Man to Pay Sh850,000 for Disclosing Friend's Alleged HIV Status in WhatsApp Group

Man to Pay Sh850,000 for Disclosing Friend's Alleged HIV Status in WhatsApp Group

The HIV and Aids Tribunal has ordered a man to pay Sh850,000 in damages for disclosing another person's HIV status on a political WhatsApp group. 

The Tribunal also prohibited the man from further divulging, discriminating, stigmatizing, or harassing the person. The Tribunal found the man's actions violated the provisions of the HIV and Aids Prevention and Control Act (HAPCA) by unlawfully disclosing the person's status to third parties without their consent. The Tribunal noted that the person's wife left their matrimonial bed, and people in their local church avoided sitting next to them after learning of their HIV status. The Tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay for the person's counseling costs.

The individuals involved were both part of a political WhatsApp group for a party's team in the Western region. On July 3rd 2023, one of them posted a comment in the group that differed from the other's opinion on who would win the Member of Parliament position in a certain constituency. As a result, the other individual publicly posted a comment that accused his friend of having HIV. This caused the friend to be humiliated and feel degraded.

The person privately messaged the other, asking him to stop making false allegations about his HIV status in political WhatsApp groups but the other was unapologetic. The individual known as Mr PMM has argued that he should be allowed to express his opinions freely in the social groups that he participates in. He claims that he has faced various difficulties, both social and psychological, as a direct result of comments made by his friend. Mr PMM has even sought counseling to cope with these challenges. 

He has tried to reason with the offending party through private messages on WhatsApp, but to no avail. The tribunal assigned to this case had previously established that a person's HIV status is a private matter that should not be disclosed without their consent, as outlined in Section 22 of HAPCA. It does not matter whether the disclosure was intentional or not, or whether the HIV status was real or perceived.

Comments

Guest (not verified)     Mon, 08/21/2023 @ 06:01pm

Nonsense how about just taking the HIV test and posting the results publicly.If he has nothing to hide that should not be a problem.Goodluck collecting 850 K from the said gossiper.Tyoe of cases clogging the courts while retirees wait for their pension and petty thieves rot in remand

Maxiley (not verified)     Mon, 08/21/2023 @ 11:36pm

In reply to by Guest (not verified)

WOw, just because you have nothing to hide does not mean that you compromise your rights,and freedom. The information maliciously spread caused damage,as noted.And that's not good.Not publishing HIV test does not mean that he has something to hide.Even if he did so what? He has to give consent for that information to be public.The offender go off cheaply.

SimamaImara (not verified)     Tue, 08/22/2023 @ 07:57pm

Western again. Hey maxiley, Luhya and gossip. It's commonly said don't have a Luhya in ya staffroom if you are a head teacher. Hedex tu. Lol

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.