Latest
Miguna Demands Sh75 Million From Sonko in Defamation ShowdownHow Much Must You Earn to Get UK Permanent Residency in 3 Years?Diaspora Jobs at Risk: How International Ebola Restrictions Are Impacting KenyansNairobi Governorship Race Exposes Opposition Cracks as Owino, Karauri and Sakaja Emerge in 2027 ContestUSCIS Changes Where Green Card Applicants Must File Form I-485, Wrong Address Risks RejectionMy Dubai Cousin Brought Phones for Everyone and Never Once Ran for MayorTrendingUS Arrests Kenyan Man After 10 Months on the Run Over Sh142m FraudTrendingFormer TV Host Regina Re and Three Relatives Held for 10 Days Over Mother's MurderTrendingMore Than 300 Kenyan Jobseekers Repatriated as Saudi Arabia Maintains Ebola-Linked Entry RestrictionsTrendingGachagua Vows to Relocate to America if Ruto Wins 2027 ElectionsTrendingMwakilishi News Bulletin - Evening Edition, Monday 02 November 2026
QR code: Mwakilishi app on Google PlayGet the Mwakilishi appFree on Google PlayKenya diaspora news on your phone, free on Google Play. Scan the code with your phone's camera to install.Get the app
AdvertisementTop banner · 970×90 / 728×90
Business

Naivas Row: Inheritance Dispute Sparks Legal War Among Siblings

Naivas Row: Inheritance Dispute Sparks Legal War Among Siblings

Amidst the towering aisles of Naivas, Kenya's premier supermarket chain, a familial storm brews over the legacy of its late founder, Peter Mukuha Kago.

AdvertisementIn-article ad

The empire he founded now stands at the centre of a legal tussle as three of his children Newton Kagira Mukuha, Grace Wambui, and David Kimani Mukuha vie to step into the shoes left vacant by their departed brother, Simon Gashwe. The trio has petitioned the Nakuru High Court to replace Gashwe, the former chairman of Naivas Supermarkets as the administrator of their father's estate. Gashwe who held a significant 25 per cent stake in Naivas had been the sole custodian of the estate since May 6, 2010, until his untimely demise in August 2019 at the Aga Khan Hospital in Nairobi.

In their pleas to the court, Kagira, Wambui, and Kimani express genuine concerns about the potential neglect and unauthorized access to the estate in Gashwe's absence. They seek to revoke the current letters of administration and usher in a new custodian to safeguard the late founder's assets. The crux of their argument lies in the incomplete distribution of their father's estate at the time of Gashwe's passing. They contend that certain assets still await dispersal, crucially impacting pending appeals that demand the representation of the late Gashwe for resolution.

Kagira emphasizes the necessity of a substitution, highlighting the potential threat to the estate's integrity and justice in the absence of proper representation. On the other front, David Kimani claims unanimous consent from their siblings for his appointment as administrator. He asserts that none of Gashwe's heirs have endorsed Kagira and Wambui for the role.

In a twist of conflict, Kimani accuses Kagira of filing lawsuits against the estate, alleging a conflict of interest as Kagira simultaneously seeks an appointment as an administrator while litigating against it. Contrary to Kagira's assertions, Kimani contends that Gashwe had efficiently concluded the estate distribution among beneficiaries before his demise.

Comments

Comments are reviewed before they appear. Please keep it respectful.

No comments yet — be the first.

AdvertisementMore stories (Google matched content)

More from Business